<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CT Blogs</title>
	<link>http://blogs.campustimes.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>&#8220;Chuck&#8221;: &#8220;Chuck Verses the Beard&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/03/11/chuck-chuck-verses-the-beard/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/03/11/chuck-chuck-verses-the-beard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica Hyman</dc:creator>
		
	<category>This Week in TV</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/03/11/chuck-chuck-verses-the-beard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's hard to believe I wasn't always a fan of "Chuck." As a fan of Sci-Fi things, I'm well aware of the literary device that is "pseudoscience," but the Intersect and the "flashing" just irked me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to believe I wasn&#8217;t always a fan of &#8220;Chuck.&#8221; I gave it a try in the first season, but the show wasn&#8217;t clicking for me. The whole concept of the Intersect just drove me crazy. As a fan of Sci-Fi things, I&#8217;m well aware of the literary device that is &#8220;pseudoscience,&#8221; but the Intersect and the &#8220;flashing&#8221; just irked me.</p>
<p>But then &#8220;Chuck&#8221; got renewed against all odds for a third season, and I fulfilled my promise to all the fans I would give it another go. And what do you know? I love it. And I loved this episode.</p>
<p>Probably the biggest event of the show was Morgan, Chuck&#8217;s best friend, finding out about Chuck&#8217;s spy life. I always loved their friendship, but as Chuck became more spy, Morgan was left in the dust. Keeping secrets drove the two life-long friends apart, and I&#8217;ve begun to miss their funny and dorky interactions. And after weeks of Morgan trying to find out the secret, we get a payoff. This wasn&#8217;t your average &#8220;I&#8217;m a secret agent&#8221; reveal for Morgan, either. He found out when they were both about to be tortured. This made for a far more excited and fulfilling reveal for the viewer.</p>
<p>Beyond that, the second biggest event to occur was the return of Jeffster, the wonderfully bizarre and 100% hilarious joining of Jeff and Lester in musical form. They did not disappoint with their gripping performance during the Buy More employee revolution. I loved the shots of the employees brandishing dart guns and taking up arms again the prospective buyers (they were actually spies, but the Buy More workers didn&#8217;t know that). Even though the show is primarily about Chuck and spying, I love the moments we get of the civilians and their lives. It&#8217;s a nice reminder that Chuck&#8217;s world isn&#8217;t always about his spy life.</p>
<p>Now that Morgan&#8217;s in the know, I have to wonder how he&#8217;ll handle keeping a big secret like that. If Awesome is any indication, Morgan will collapse like a folding chair. Captain Awesome is having a very hard time keeping up with his name. He is not being very awesome, bumbling with lies to Ellie. And now he&#8217;s freaking out and talking about going to Africa. Hopefully he and Ellie stick around, because I love them! Ellie and Chuck have the sweetest brother/sister relationship. Meanwhile Awesome is funny and is not unpleasant to look at. They probably will, but I have a feeling Ellie will soon learn about Chuck&#8217;s secret profession, now that Awesome and Morgan both know and both will try keep up Chuck&#8217;s lies. With the Ring closing in on Chuck&#8217;s real life, everyone he cares about is in danger.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/03/11/chuck-chuck-verses-the-beard/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Screen or Not to Screen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/03/06/to-screen-or-not-to-screen/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/03/06/to-screen-or-not-to-screen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erin Philbrick</dc:creator>
		
	<category>The Other Side</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/03/06/to-screen-or-not-to-screen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Instead of the previous standard-of-care yearly mammogram after age 40, the USPSTF now recommends beginning screening at age 50 and only getting screened every other year. This caused quite a stir in the medical community]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This semester I’m taking a course in the Epidemiology and Prevention of Chronic Disease. Most recently, we’ve been talking about cancer and, more specifically, about screening for cancer.</p>
<p>As you may or may not be aware, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force came out with some pretty controversial guidelines for breast cancer screening at the end of last year. Instead of the previous standard-of-care yearly mammogram after age 40, the USPSTF now recommends beginning screening at age 50 and only getting screened every other year. This caused quite a stir in the medical community and is the topic of today’s <a href="http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/cpm/departmental-seminars/public-health-grand-rounds.cfm">Public Health Grand Rounds</a>. At this talk, Professor Ruth Kouides, MD is going to talk about what the evidence shows for breast cancer screening.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, what I’m learning is that, for many cancers, the current screening available really isn’t all that it’s cracked up to be. A lot of uncertainties remain from the various clinical trials testing the benefits and harms of screening for cancer. The problem is that, for diseases like prostate cancer and breast cancer, tumors may manifest that never would have caused any harm to an individual in the first place. By detecting these tumors through screening the problem of “overdiagnosis” arises. Patients are going through unnecessary treatments that may actually cause more harm than good — if not physically, then mentally. Also, the data are still unclear as to whether screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer is actually reducing cancer mortality.</p>
<p>Although there is concern about the effectiveness of some cancer screening, it is not fair to say that no screening should be done. For some people who are known to be at very high risk of cancer, screening is essential so that the tumor can be found at an earlier, less malignant stage. Also, screenings for other cancers, such as colonoscopies, have been very beneficial in preventing onset of disease or catching the tumor at a very manageable state.</p>
<p>Obviously, there is still a lot to be learned and discovered about cancer screening — if you’re interested in cancer, a large and diverse career path awaits you!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/03/06/to-screen-or-not-to-screen/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rare Ould Time</title>
		<link>http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/03/04/rare-ould-time/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/03/04/rare-ould-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Willie Clark</dc:creator>
		
	<category>The Editor's Desk</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/03/04/rare-ould-time/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Beloved CT readers,</p>
<p>Hello everybody and welcome to another lovely week at the CT.</p>
<p>This is our last issue before spring break, and also will be our last issue until March 25. We originally had an issue planned for March 18, the week we got back, but after discussing it with staff we decided to not publish ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beloved <em>CT</em> readers,</p>
<p>Hello everybody and welcome to another lovely week at the <em>CT</em>.</p>
<p>This is our last issue before spring break, and also will be our last issue until March 25. We originally had an issue planned for March 18, the week we got back, but after discussing it with staff we decided to not publish directly following a break. In past years we have had that week off, and last year we ran a awesome 28-page issue since we had the two weeks of news build up, so we decided that taking that week off was better than trying to put an issue together in only a few days of being back on campus. </p>
<p>But fear not <em>CT</em> readers, as we have come up with a 21st century idea that will help still bring you news that week. With the invention of something called the internet, we are taking advantage of our Web site to create a unique way to still deliver news during our first week back from break.</p>
<p>Our solution is this: The <em>CT</em> will be publishing some online only stories the week of the 18th. This allows us to still write stories and help deliver news, and also helps us from having three full weeks where we would be publishing no new content. We will also be sending out an online newsletter that week, so everybody on the mailing list will still get their weekly email full of the best stories from each section. </p>
<p>With this step in the digital direction, I am hoping to continue to publish such online only stories for breaking news, or for updates of stories that may change direction or pace in the middle of our production cycle. We aren’t a daily, but we do have complete access to an online forum whenever we need it, and I really am hoping to take further advantage of that in the future, and using our Web site for this vehicle after spring break is only a first step in fully utilizing our online content to the best of our ability.</p>
<p>And not to get completely on my personal soap box, but I do want to stress that the <em>CT</em> is still a print product first, and this new look at online is by no way a means of looking less at the print edition. I personally feel that the print medium, while struggling globally, will somehow find a way to adapt. That being said; I think there is a lot the <em>CT</em> can do online, but first and foremost feel that the print edition should be my greatest concern and the most prominent. </p>
<p>Enjoy the week off from the print edition, and make sure to check the Web site the following week for updated stories from each section!</p>
<p>Enjoy this week’s edition of the paper (and spring break!).Until the next two weeks. Rock it, Rochester.</p>
<p>-Willie Clark<br />
<em>Campus Time</em> Editor-in-Chief </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/03/04/rare-ould-time/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double Trouble</title>
		<link>http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/03/02/double-trouble/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/03/02/double-trouble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross Brenneman</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Call To Question</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/03/02/double-trouble/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’ve gotten wind of the agenda this week, and braced for impact at the promise of at least one round of executive session. AND UNFORTUNATELY WE FORGOT THE ADAPTER.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve gotten wind of the agenda this week, and braced for impact at the promise of at least one round of executive session. AND UNFORTUNATELY WE FORGOT THE ADAPTER. </p>
<p>In Open Forum, we learned that if you fill out the Campus Climate Survey, you may receive free tchotchkes! Also, apparently some all-inclusive posters for Black History Month and Women’s History Month show what a united front UR has put up, and what a true community UR has become, according to University Intercessor Kathy Sweetland, via Speaker of the Senate Kierstin Hughes. One of the only things more exciting than the content of the preceding run-on sentence is that, by the way, it’s Women’s History Month! HOORAY WOMEN! (<a href="http://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/2010/02/06/">NOW MAKE US A SANDWICH!</a>)</p>
<p>In other news, SA Treasurer Andrew Flack (FLACK!) announced that no, there were no supplemental funding requests this week. Flack also noted what remained in the supplemental funding coffers. The Programming Fund has $6,579 left, Equipment has $2,500 and Experience Eastman has $1,510 left. Unfortunately, most of that money will have to go toward a bailout of the Greek Students’ Association. HA HA! INSOLVENCY! </p>
<p>Communications announced that funds were secured for two suggestion boxes, which will be placed in either Rush Rhees Library, Carlson Library, Starbucks, Hillside or Connections (those last two still need approval as said locations). NOW THAT’S WHAT WE CALL A LUNCH BOX! (Mmm, clever.) </p>
<p>Newly appointed Elections Chair and Senator Lauren Sussman announced an overhaul of the SA Convention, the spring expo where governmental candidates attempt to get their achievements recognized — the lead achievement being that most students walk away having learned that there’s a student government. MAKE IT EXPO-NENTIALLY BETTER! </p>
<p>In Policy &#038; Review Committee News, Chair and Senator Kristian Brooks announced that four groups came up for preliminary status, including Young Americans for Liberty, Transfer Students’ Association, Liberty for North Korea and Mariachi Meliora, which is definitely a scam, or at best, the worst-named group since NAMBLA. </p>
<p>To hear Projects &#038; Services member and Senator Rohini Bhatia tell it, aided by Co-Chair and Senator Bradley Halpern and SA President Eric Weissmann, reducing the cost of double-sided printing is akin to passing a kidney stone the size of Alcatraz (there’s a joke in there, folks, for you culturally savvy). IT is running a $300,000 printing deficit to the amount and maintenance of printers, which are replaced every four years. There’s also a plethora of probably largely unused color printers, which are even more expensive to maintain. As Deputy Speaker of the Senate Dan Cohn put it: “I’m going to speak for everyone, and collectively call ‘bullshit.’” WILL THAT MAKE THE MINUTES? </p>
<p>In New Business, not only were last week’s minutes approved, but everyone in the world (of Senate) was nominated to be on the committee which would conduct a round of interviews for next year’s All-Campus Judicial Council nominees. Only six actually accepted the nominations. When the executive session dust settled, Sens. Sylvia Guerra, Ashley Haluck-Kangas, Andrea Sobolewski and Sneha Rath were triumphant. NOW THAT’S WHAT WE CALL A “SELECT” FEW. </p>
<p>The last item of new business was meant to be a motion to approve another senator to the Steering Committee, due to a vacancy caused by scheduling conflicts for Sen. Casey Slone. Sen. Jon Junig moved to table the motion indefinitely, stating that Steering did not need another senator at this point in the year. Guerra went toe-to-with Junig, whom Hughes sided with, and Weissmann noted that since Steering probably wasn’t meeting formally before the next Senate meeting, they could just delay the vote and do it later. In a 13-4 decision, the Senate went with that idea on a second motion by Junig. VACANCY OVER VACAY! </p>
<p>Speaking of Spring Break, there’s no meeting next week. <a href="http://xkcd.com/529/">Grab a sled and have some fun</a>, or stay warm and watch “Cool Runnings” while reminiscing about the Winter Olympics. FEEL DA RIDDUM! </p>
<p>Adjourned!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/03/02/double-trouble/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Center for Community Health</title>
		<link>http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/02/26/the-center-for-community-health/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/02/26/the-center-for-community-health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 04:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erin Philbrick</dc:creator>
		
	<category>The Other Side</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/02/26/the-center-for-community-health/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This summer, I’ll be working on a project that examines local physicians’ attitudes toward the HPV vaccine, specifically in reference to administering it to women ages 18-26.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As epidemiology graduate students, we are required to find summer jobs that are somehow related to our field. As I was doing some research into possible areas of interest, I found that many of the other students in my program had completed summer work at the <a href=”http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/community-health/index.cfm”>Center for Community Health</a>. This piqued my interest, as this was a way to combine my interest in community health outreach with an academic institution. This summer, I’ll be working on a project that examines local physicians’ attitudes toward the HPV vaccine, specifically in reference to administering it to women ages 18-26.</p>
<p>The Center for Community Health is a joint effort between UR and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CCH’s mission is to develop and expand research and programs to improve community health. Specifically, it aims to do this by providing community members with support from researchers, centrally coordinating health issues, tracking community health data and implementing community health projects. The two main areas of UR’s CCH are the Communicable Disease, Immunization and Vaccine Efficacy Studies and the Cancer Services Program of Monroe County. Together, all the members of CCH work to improve the overall health and well-being of Monroe County and its surrounding areas.</p>
<p>What I find so great about this center is that it provides a way for community members and researchers to work together toward a common goal. CCH is the embodiment of <a href=”http://blogs.campustimes.org/2009/11/20/cbpr-the-new-way-to-do-research/”>Community-Based Participatory Research</a>. It has the potential to significantly impact the Rochester community for the better, and I look forward to becoming a part of it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://blogs.campustimes.org/2010/02/26/the-center-for-community-health/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
